4.7 Article

A Universal Method for Developing Autoinduction Expression Systems Using AHL-Mediated Quorum-Sensing Circuits

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 3114-3119

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00400

关键词

quorum sensing; autonomous induction; protein expression; metabolic engineering

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFC2101800]
  2. Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences [IAGM-2019-A02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major challenge in engineering microorganisms for desirable product is the balance between cell growth and product synthesis. In this study, researchers developed a method to screen and evaluate different quorum sensing systems and achieved efficient product synthesis in microorganisms. This approach can be widely applied in various microorganisms.
A major challenge in engineering microorganisms for the desirable product is maintaining the rational balance between cell growth and production. Quorum sensing (QS)-based dynamic regulations provide a pathway-independent genetic control technology to rebalance metabolic flux for biomass and product synthesis. However, the lack of a universal method for screening QS elements and the complex design of autoinduction circuits limit their applications in metabolic engineering. Here, we developed a universal method for simple and rapid screening and evaluating various QS systems from Gram-negative bacteria, and the largest library containing 195 combinations of receiving device/signal molecules was constructed and evaluated in Escherichia coli. A simple logical circuit with different inducer synthesis rates was established to dynamically regulate gene expression levels, leading to efficient protein expression and product synthesis. The system was further applied in Pseudomonas putida, which indicated it could be widely accommodated in other microorganisms. Therefore, the method could be used in diverse Gram-negative strains for the desired biosynthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据