4.7 Article

Changes in metamorphopsia following intravitreal aflibercept injection for diabetic macular edema

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22401-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Osaka, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in metamorphopsia in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) following intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVA) with the treat and extend (TAE) regimen for one year. The study findings showed that the metamorphopsia score in patients with DME improved following IVA with the TAE regimen, and the presence of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) was associated with the metamorphopsia score.
The aim of the present study was to investigate changes in metamorphopsia in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) following intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVA) with the treat and extend (TAE) regimen for a year. We performed a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective study. The study included 20 patients with DME. All eyes received 3 monthly loading injections of 2 mg aflibercept, followed by a TAE regimen. Every visit, the severity of metamorphopsia and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were obtained. The severity of metamorphopsia was measured using M-CHARTS. The metamorphopsia scores before treatment and at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months following treatment were 0.25 +/- 0.23, 0.21 +/- 0.15, 0.19 +/- 0.23, 0.14 +/- 0.16, 0.17 +/- 0.20 and 0.10 +/- 0.17, respectively, with significant improvement from before treatment to 3 and 12 months following treatment (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005, respectively). At the time of macular edema resolution, the presence of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) was associated with the metamorphopsia score (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the metamorphopsia score in patients with DME improved following IVA with the TAE regimen for one year. The presence of ERM was associated with the metamorphopsia score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据