4.7 Article

Constrained quantum optimization for extractive summarization on a trapped-ion quantum computer

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20853-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. DoE ASCR Accelerated Research in Quantum Computing program [DE-SC0020312]
  2. DoE QSA
  3. NSL QLCI [OMA-2120757]
  4. NSF PFCQC program
  5. DoE ASCR Quantum Testbed Pathfinder program [DE-SC0019040]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0019499]
  7. AFOSR
  8. ARO MURI
  9. AFOSR MURI
  10. DARPA SAVaNT ADVENT
  11. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019499] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work explores the potential of near-term quantum computers to solve constrained-optimization problems and demonstrates the largest execution of a quantum optimization algorithm that preserves constraints on quantum hardware. By encoding the constraints directly into the quantum circuit, the necessity for this approach is shown. Different optimization algorithms are compared, and the implications of their execution on near-term quantum hardware are discussed.
Realizing the potential of near-term quantum computers to solve industry-relevant constrained-optimization problems is a promising path to quantum advantage. In this work, we consider the extractive summarization constrained-optimization problem and demonstrate the largest-to-date execution of a quantum optimization algorithm that natively preserves constraints on quantum hardware. We report results with the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz algorithm with a Hamming-weight-preserving XY mixer (XY-QAOA) on trapped-ion quantum computer. We successfully execute XY-QAOA circuits that restrict the quantum evolution to the in-constraint subspace, using up to 20 qubits and a two-qubit gate depth of up to 159. We demonstrate the necessity of directly encoding the constraints into the quantum circuit by showing the trade-off between the in-constraint probability and the quality of the solution that is implicit if unconstrained quantum optimization methods are used. We show that this trade-off makes choosing good parameters difficult in general. We compare XY-QAOA to the Layer Variational Quantum Eigensolver algorithm, which has a highly expressive constant-depth circuit, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. We discuss the respective trade-offs of the algorithms and implications for their execution on near-term quantum hardware.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据