4.7 Article

Epidermal growth factor receptor cascade prioritizes the maximization of signal transduction

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20663-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [15H05721]
  2. Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, MEXT, Japan
  3. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
  4. US Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many studies have been conducted to quantify cell signaling. The ratio of signal transduction quantity to signal duration plays an important role in the signal cascade. Research suggests that signal transduction systems may prioritize the maximization of signal transduction quantity.
Many studies have been performed to quantify cell signaling. Cell signaling molecules are phosphorylated in response to extracellular stimuli, with the phosphorylation sequence forming a signal cascade. The information gain during a signal event is given by the logarithm of the phosphorylation molecule ratio. The average information gain can be regarded as the signal transduction quantity (ST), which is identical to the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), a relative entropy. We previously reported that if the total ST value in a given signal cascade is maximized, the ST rate (STR) of each signaling molecule per signal duration (min) approaches a constant value. To experimentally verify this theoretical conclusion, we measured the STR of the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-related cascade in A431 skin cancer cells following stimulation with EGF using antibody microarrays against phosphorylated signal molecules. The results were consistent with those from the theoretical analysis. Thus, signaling transduction systems may adopt a strategy that prioritizes the maximization of ST. Furthermore, signal molecules with similar STRs may form a signal cascade. In conclusion, ST and STR are promising properties for quantitative analysis of signal transduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据