4.7 Article

Municipal and neighbourhood level wastewater surveillance and subtyping of an influenza virus outbreak

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20076-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Province of Ontario's Wastewater Surveillance Initiative (WSI)
  2. CHEO (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) CHAMO (Children's Hospital Academic Medical Organization)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global clinical surveillance is crucial for monitoring and reporting influenza strains, while wastewater surveillance (WWS) can serve as a less resource-intensive alternative. Our study shows that influenza virus targets are stable in wastewater and can be used to forecast flu outbreaks with a 17-day lead time, providing real-time viral subtyping at the municipal and neighborhood levels using minimal resources and infrastructure.
Recurrent influenza epidemics and pandemic potential are significant risks to global health. Public health authorities use clinical surveillance to locate and monitor influenza and influenza-like cases and outbreaks to mitigate hospitalizations and deaths. Currently, global integration of clinical surveillance is the only reliable method for reporting influenza types and subtypes to warn of emergent pandemic strains. The utility of wastewater surveillance (WWS) during the COVID-19 pandemic as a less resource intensive replacement or complement for clinical surveillance has been predicated on analyzing viral fragments in wastewater. We show here that influenza virus targets are stable in wastewater and partitions favorably to the solids fraction. By quantifying, typing, and subtyping the virus in municipal wastewater and primary sludge during a community outbreak, we forecasted a citywide flu outbreak with a 17-day lead time and provided population-level viral subtyping in near real-time to show the feasibility of influenza virus WWS at the municipal and neighbourhood levels in near real time using minimal resources and infrastructure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据