4.7 Article

Research on a novel and improved incremental conductance method

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20133-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. University Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project of China [201910380020]
  2. Anhui Province University Excellent Young Talent Project of China [gxyq2019083]
  3. Chaohu University Key Research Project, Anhui, China [XLZ-202101]
  4. Photovoltaic flexible electrode technology research and development, Anhui, China [hxkt20220016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an improved variable-step incremental conductance method, which analyzes the I-U characteristic curve of the photovoltaic panel and divides it into different sections for global control. The simulation results show that this method has advantages in steady-state error, response speed, and efficiency of photovoltaic power generation.
Aiming at the problem that the steady-state error and response speed cannot be taken into account in the traditional fixed-step incremental conductance method, combined with the current-voltage (I-U) characteristic curve of photovoltaic (PV) panel, this paper proposes a novel and improved variable-step incremental conductance method. The proposed tracking strategy of maximum power point (MPP) analyzes the I-U characteristic curve, and divides the I-U characteristic curve into four sections, each section has a different variable step size, thus realizing the variable step size control of global four-section. The traditional incremental conductance method and the improved incremental conductance method are simulated under the environment of Matlab/Simulink. The simulation results show that when the light intensity changes rapidly, the novel improved incremental conductance method not only has the advantages of no oscillation in steady state and fast response speed, but also improve the efficiency of photovoltaic power generation, which better realizes the fast and accurate tracking of MPP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据