4.7 Article

Mapping human disease-associated enzymes into Reactome allows characterization of disease groups and their interactions

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22818-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research [PRIN2017, 2017483NH8_002]
  2. ELIXIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on databases such as OMIM, Humsavar, Clinvar and Monarch, this study analyzes the association between human enzymes and genetic diseases, finding that 75% of them are rare diseases. By adopting the Mondo ontology initiative and Reactome pathways, a comprehensive understanding and categorization of the molecular mechanisms of diseases have been achieved.
According to databases such as OMIM, Humsavar, Clinvar and Monarch, 1494 human enzymes are presently associated to 2539 genetic diseases, 75% of which are rare (with an Orphanet code). The Mondo ontology initiative allows a standardization of the disease name into specific codes, making it possible a computational association between genes, variants, diseases, and their effects on biological processes. Here, we tackle the problem of which biological processes enzymes can affect when the protein variant is disease-associated. We adopt Reactome to describe human biological processes, and by mapping disease-associated enzymes in the Reactome pathways, we establish a Reactome-disease association. This allows a novel categorization of human monogenic and polygenic diseases based on Reactome pathways and reactions. Our analysis aims at dissecting the complexity of the human genetic disease universe, highlighting all the possible links within diseases and Reactome pathways. The novel mapping helps understanding the biochemical/molecular biology of the disease and allows a direct glimpse on the present knowledge of other molecules involved. This is useful for a complete overview of the disease molecular mechanism/s and for planning future investigations. Data are collected in DAR, a database that is free for search and available at .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据