4.7 Article

Hunting and persecution drive mammal declines in Iran

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22238-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (FCT) [GHY: PD/BD/52605/2014, JCB: CEECINST/00014/2018/CP1512/CT0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the potential impacts of direct killing, indirect human threats, and environmental and species traits on mammal species extinction. The results show that hunting vulnerability is the most important factor affecting extinction risk for all mammal species. Small-bodied species are more impacted by indirect human influence, while large species are highly affected by direct killing.
The negative impacts of human activities on biodiversity are well documented. However, extinction risk studies incorporating direct human threats particularly direct killing remain limited. Here, we evaluate the potential role that direct killing through hunting and persecution, indirect human threats via land-use change, and environmental and species traits such as reproductive rate and trophic level among others, may play in driving mammal species to extinction. Based on data for 156 mammal species from Iran, we applied generalized linear models to investigate correlates of extinction risk for: (1) all mammalian species, (2) large- and (3) small-bodied species. We show that hunting vulnerability is the most important predictor to affect extinction risk across all species. We also found that the small-bodied species are impacted by indirect human influence, whereas large species are highly affected by direct killing. Overall, the extrinsic environmental factors and intrinsic species traits had lower importance in our models. Our study gives insight into the dominant role of direct killing on mammal species decline and extinction, emphasizing the need to account for the different sources of threats when analysing the correlates of extinction risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据