4.7 Review

Post-Diagnosis Vitamin D Supplement Use and Survival among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14163418

关键词

vitamin D supplement use; post-diagnosis; overall survival; progression-free survival; cancer-specific survival; relapse; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trial; cohort study

资金

  1. BK21-plus education program funding from the National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. [R01 AT 011729]
  3. [R01 HL34594]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement use may be associated with improved overall survival among cancer patients, but not with progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, or relapse.
Vitamin D administered pre-diagnostically has been shown to reduce mortality. Emerging evidence suggests a role of post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement intake for survival among cancer patients. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant observational cohort studies and randomized trials published through April 2022. Summary relative risk (SRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The SRR for post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement use vs. non-use, pooling cohort studies and randomized trials, was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98; p = 0.02; I-2 = 0%) for overall survival, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.62-1.06; p = 0.12; I-2 = 51%) for progression-free survival, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-1.03; p = 0.10; I-2 = 0%) for cancer-specific survival, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.64-1.14; p = 0.29; I-2 = 0%) for relapse. Albeit not significantly heterogeneous by variables tested, a significant inverse association was limited to cohort studies and supplement use during cancer treatment for overall survival, and to studies with <= 3 years of follow-up for progression-free survival. Post-diagnosis vitamin D supplement use was associated with improved overall survival, but not progression-free or cancer-specific survival or relapse. Our findings require confirmation, as randomized trial evidence was insufficient to establish cause-and-effect relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据