4.7 Article

Variability in Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis Rates in Critically Ill Patients

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14183733

关键词

protein synthesis; stable isotopes; muscle morphology; multiple organ failure

资金

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council
  2. Stockholm County Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a large variation in muscle protein synthesis rates in critically ill patients, which is not due to heterogeneity in synthesis rates or infiltrating cells. There are differences in the synthesis rates of different proteins, but these do not explain the larger variations.
(1) Background: Muscle protein synthesis in critically ill patients is, on average, normal despite dramatic muscle loss, but the variation is much larger than in controls. Here, we evaluate if this variation is due to 1) heterogeneity in synthesis rates, 2) morphological variation or infiltrating cells, or 3) heterogeneity in the synthesis of different protein fractions. (2) Methods: Muscle biopsies were taken from both legs of critically ill patients (n = 17). Mixed and mitochondrial protein synthesis rates and morphologies were evaluated in both legs. Synthesis rates of myosin and actin were determined in combined biopsies and compared with controls. (3) Results: Muscle protein synthesis rates had a large variability in the patients (1.4-10.8%/day). No differences in mixed and mitochondrial protein synthesis rates between both legs were observed. A microscopic examination revealed no morphological differences between the two legs or any infiltrating inflammatory cells. The synthesis rates for myosin were lower and for actin they were higher in the muscles of critically ill patients, compared with the controls. (4) Conclusions: The large variation in muscle protein synthesis rates in critically ill patients is not the result of heterogeneity in synthesis rates, nor due to infiltrating cells. There are differences in the synthesis rates of different proteins, but these do not explain the larger variations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据