4.7 Article

Allergic Disorders and Risk of Anemia in Japanese Children: Findings from the Japan Environment and Children's Study

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14204335

关键词

children; birth cohort; allergy; anemia; health

资金

  1. Ministry of the Environment, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have found an increased risk of anemia in people with allergic disorders, but they were cross-sectional in design. This study used a cohort dataset and found that children with asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and food allergies at 2 years of age had a higher likelihood of developing anemia in the next year. Additionally, any allergy at 2 years of age was associated with an increased risk of anemia at the age of 3 years.
Previous epidemiological studies have reported an increased risk of anemia in people with allergic disorders. However, previous studies have followed a cross-sectional design. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the two conditions with a cohort dataset. We used data of 80,943 children in the Japan Environment and Children's Study, the largest birth cohort in Japan. The association between anemia and allergic disorders was evaluated with a logistic regression model and propensity score analysis. After adjusting for potential confounders, children with asthma (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.60), atopic dermatitis (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.66-2.85), allergic rhinitis (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.91-4.54), and food allergies (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.44-2.56) at 2 years of age predicted high odds of developing anemia in the next year. Any allergy at 2 years of age was associated with an increased risk of anemia at the age of 3 years (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.41-2.29). The findings remained stable in the propensity score analysis. Results suggest that allergic diseases were related to caregiver-reported anemia in children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据