4.7 Review

Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors for the Incidence and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in the Healthy Young and Middle-Aged Population

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14183787

关键词

occupational health; obesity; dyslipidemia; hyperuricemia; metabolic syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been increasing, and younger and middle-aged individuals with lifestyle-related diseases are at a higher risk of CKD. This article summarizes the predictive factors for CKD in the young population and the management of common diseases like hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged patients. As kidney function is mostly normal in the younger and middle-aged population with a lower risk of incident CKD, this review is important for reducing the prevalence of CKD.
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) increased by 88% from 1990 to 2016. Age of onset of lifestyle-related diseases (such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia), which are risk factors for incident CKD, is lower now compared with the past. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the risk factors for the incidence and progression of CKD in the young and middle-aged population. There are differences in the risk for CKD among the young, middle-aged, and elderly populations. We aimed to assess obesity (which is basic component of metabolic syndrome), waist circumference, and abdominal adiposity, which are predictive factors of CKD in the younger population. Furthermore, we described the management and clinical evidence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia for young and middle-aged patients, along with diet management and nutrients associated with kidney function. Kidney function in the young and middle-aged population is mostly normal, and they are considered a low-risk group for incident CKD. Thus, we expect this review to be useful in reducing the prevalence of CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据