4.7 Article

The Gut Microbial Metabolite Pyrogallol Is a More Potent Inducer of Nrf2-Associated Gene Expression Than Its Parent Compound Green Tea (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14163392

关键词

EGCG; Nrf2; proteomics; pyrogallol; t-BHQ

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201803250053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the gut microbiota-derived metabolite PG is a more potent inducer of Nrf2-related gene expression than its parent compound EGCG.
(-)-Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) has been associated with multiple beneficial effects. However, EGCG is known to be degraded by the gut microbiota. The present study investigated the hypothesis that microbial metabolism would create major catechol-moiety-containing microbial metabolites with different ability from EGCG to induce nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated gene expression. A reporter gene bioassay, label-free quantitative proteomics and reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) were combined to investigate the regulation of Nrf2-related gene expression after exposure of U2OS reporter gene or Hepa1c1c7 cells in vitro to EGCG or to its major microbial catechol-moiety-containing metabolites: (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC), gallic acid (GA) and pyrogallol (PG). Results show that PG was a more potent inducer of Nrf2-mediated gene expression than EGCG, with a 5% benchmark dose (BMD5) of 0.35 mu M as compared to 2.45 mu M for EGCG in the reporter gene assay. EGC and GA were unable to induce Nrf2-mediated gene expression up to the highest concentration tested (75 mu M). Bioinformatical analysis of the proteomics data indicated that Nrf2 induction by PG relates to glutathione metabolism, drug and/or xenobiotics metabolism and the pentose phosphate pathway. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that the microbial metabolite PG is a more potent inducer of Nrf2-associated gene expression than its parent compound EGCG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据