4.6 Article

Whole-Brain Connectome of GABAergic Neurons in the Mouse Zona Incerta

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 38, 期 11, 页码 1315-1329

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-022-00930-w

关键词

Zona incerta; GABAergic neurons; Whole-brain connectome; Input circuit; Output circuit; Topological connection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61890953, 31871088]
  2. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2019-I2M-5-014]
  3. Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study comprehensively mapped the long-range connectivity of different sectors in the mouse ZI using fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography and viral tracing techniques. The results show that the input-output circuits of ZI GABAergic neurons are topologically organized, and the medial and lateral ZI are two different major functional compartments.
The zona incerta (ZI) is involved in various functions and may serve as an integrative node of the circuits for global behavioral modulation. However, the long-range connectivity of different sectors in the mouse ZI has not been comprehensively mapped. Here, we obtained whole-brain images of the input and output connections via fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography and viral tracing. The principal regions in the input-output circuits of ZI GABAergic neurons were topologically organized. The 3D distribution of cortical inputs showed rostro-caudal correspondence with different ZI sectors, while the projection fibers from ZI sectors were longitudinally organized in the superior colliculus. Clustering results show that the medial and lateral ZI are two different major functional compartments, and they can be further divided into more subdomains based on projection and input connectivity. This study provides a comprehensive anatomical foundation for understanding how the ZI is involved in integrating different information, conveying motivational states, and modulating global behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据