Integrating Place Attachment into Housing Recovery Simulations to Estimate Population Losses

Following a disaster, residents of a community may be displaced from their damaged homes, leading to expensive and lengthy disruption, with many choosing to move away permanently. Population losses may hinder recovery and exacerbate inequalities across neighborhoods. This study considered household place attachment and identified groups with low place attachment along with expensive and slow postdisaster recovery. We developed a framework to integrate place attachment considerations into housing recovery simulations. We used data from the American Housing Survey to develop housing and neighborhood satisfaction models and identify the neighborhoods with the least-attached residents. A computational simulation framework was used to simulate postearthquake housing recovery for a community and assess expected costs and time frames. We used the triad of low place attachment, high cost, and slow recovery to identify households prone to permanently moving away from their communities. A case study of housing recovery after a hypothetical earthquake near San Francisco demonstrated the application of the methodology. We found that about 10% of the population in some neighborhoods are prone to moving away after a large earthquake. Households with low income, renters, and those in older buildings are most likely to have low place attachment and experience costly and slow recovery. Whereas existing approaches rely on heuristics, the approach and results in this paper provide quantitative means to assess potential population losses and inform efforts to reduce them. The framework to integrate place attachment into housing recovery simulations is versatile and employs publicly available information making it transferable to other communities. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Automated summary

This study considers the impact of place attachment on post-disaster housing recovery and develops a framework to integrate place attachment into housing recovery simulations. The study finds that households with low place attachment, high cost, and slow recovery are more likely to permanently move away from their communities. Low-income households, renters, and those in older buildings are more likely to have low place attachment and experience costly and slow recovery.