4.6 Article

Fracture Strain of Al-Si-Coated Press-Hardened Steels under Plane-Strain Bending

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15207345

关键词

fracture strain; press-hardened steel; bendability; plane-strain bending; Al-Si coating

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52105395]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2022T150478]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the performance differences of 22MnB5 steels with different coatings and initial thicknesses under plane-strain bending, with results showing that PHS with lower coating weight has a larger bending angle and fracture limit strain.
Press-hardened steel (PHS) is widely applied to fabricate vehicle body structures for attaining mass reduction and fuel economy without sacrificing occupant safety. The VDA bendability test is often used to characterize the fracture resistance of PHS under plane-strain bending conditions. As lightweighting continues to be a design imperative in the automotive industry, it is desirable to develop and adopt more press-hardened components with higher fracture resistance. In this work, four Al-Si-coated 22MnB5 steels with various initial thicknesses and coating weights were studied. A newly developed methodology was used to calculate the fracture limit strain under plane-strain bending. The results indicate that although the four investigated 22MnB5 steels exhibit similar tensile properties under uniaxial tension, their bending performance per the VDA 238-100 standard differs significantly. The PHS with a low coating weight possesses a higher bending angle and, hence, a larger fracture limit strain. Meanwhile, the peak bending force can be 10% higher than the PHS with a standard coating weight at the same sheet thickness. Therefore, it is expected that PHS with higher fracture strain will have the potential for lightweighting due to its enhanced resistance to fracture and higher energy absorption capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据