4.6 Article

Development of Biodegradable PLA/PBAT-Based Filaments for Fertilizer Release for Agricultural Applications

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15196764

关键词

controlled release; nanocomposites; 3D printing; biodegradable

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to produce biodegradable agricultural artifacts using 3D printing technology, using fibers of PLA/PBAT and NPK fertilizer adsorbed on organophilized bentonite. The results show that systems containing organobentonite release fertilizer at a slower rate and the release data fits the Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic model better.
The aim of this work was to produce filaments of PLA/PBAT and NPK fertilizer adsorbed on organophilized bentonite intended for application in the prototyping of biodegradable agricultural artifacts in 3D printing, using the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technique. This is the first time that we have reported this composite for a 3D printing approach. Systems containing PLA/PBAT, organobentonite and NPK were initially processed in an internal mixer and later extruded as filaments in a single-screw extruder. The prototypes were printed by FDM. Structural, morphological and thermal properties, as well as NPK releasing, were investigated. The results suggest that exfoliated and/or intercalated nanocomposites were obtained by the organoclay addition to the PLA/PBAT blend. The morphological analysis revealed a good surface quality of the impressions. Systems containing organobentonite released approximately 22% less fertilizer in 24 h compared to the systems without organobentonite. This difference is due to the higher concentration of nanoparticles that generate more barriers to the diffusion of NPK. The release data for these systems had a better fit to the kinetic model of Korsmeyer-Peppas. Thus, studied filaments have the potential to retard the release of fertilizer and are suitable for further development of structures for agricultural applications by FDM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据