4.6 Article

The Effect of Carbon Content on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cemented Carbides with a CoNiFeCr High Entropy Alloy Binder

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15165780

关键词

cemented carbides; microstructure; transverse rupture strength; fracture toughness; two-phase region

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFB3701800]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, CoNiFeCr high entropy alloy was used as a binder in cemented carbides, and the microstructure of WC-HEA cemented carbides with different binder components and carbon contents was investigated. Compared with WC-Co, WC-CoNiFeCr exhibited smaller WC grain size, smoother grain shape, higher transverse rupture strength, and slightly lower hardness.
CoNiFeCr high entropy alloy (HEA) was used as a binder in cemented carbides for developing a new high-performance binder. The microstructure of WC-HEA cemented carbides with different binder components and carbon contents was subsequently studied. It was observed that the (Cr,W)C phase precipitated at the WC/HEA interface, and a coherent interface with a low degree of misfit was formed between WC and (Cr,W)C, thereby resulting in a significant reduction in the interfacial energy and stress concentration. The (Cr,W)C phase exerted a pinning force (Zener-drag) on the moving grain boundaries, which effectively inhibited the growth of WC grains. As a result, compared with WC-Co, WC-CoNiFeCr had smaller WC grain size, smoother grain shape and larger mean free path (MFP) of the binder, which resulted in slightly lower hardness and higher transverse rupture strength (TRS) and fracture toughness. The lower limit of carbon content in WC-CoNiFeCr was higher than that of WC-Co. With the addition of Ni, the width of the two-phase region became wider, whereas the width of the two-phase region became narrower with the addition of Fe and Cr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据