4.6 Article

Euphorane C, an unusual C17-norabietane diterpenoid from Euphorbia dracunculoides induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human leukemia K562 cells

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104203

关键词

Euphorbia dracunculoides; Cytotoxicity; Apoptosis; Abietane diterpenoid; Norabietane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22167009]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Fund [2021M693809]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Fund of Guizhou Medical University [YJ20073]
  4. Guizhou Science and Technology Department [2020-5006, 2020-6011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four new polycyclic diterpenoids, including two with novel chemical structures, were isolated from the whole plants of Euphorbia dracunculoides. One of the compounds showed significant anticancer activity.
Four new polycyclic diterpenoids euphoranes A -D (1-4), together with 12 known ter-penoids (5-16) were isolated from the whole plants of Euphorbia dracunculoides. Compound 2 rep-resents the first example of aromatic 15,16,17-trinorabietane diterpenoid in Euphorbia species, and euphorane C (3) is an unusual 17-norabietane diterpenoid. The absolute configurations of 1, 2, and 4 were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction, while that of 3 was established with the aid of ECD and 1D NMR quantum chemical calculation. Moreover, the absolute stereochemistry of 11 was demonstrated for the first time by crystallographic data. Compounds 1-16 were screened for antiproliferative activities against five human cancer cell lines, and 3 showed significant cytotoxicity against the human leukemia K562 cells with IC50 value of 3.59 lM. Preliminary mechanistic inves-tigation revealed that 3 could induce cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and apoptosis in K562 cells.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据