4.8 Article

Insight into the Effect of Cu Species and Its Origin in Pt-Based Catalysts on Reaction Pathways of Glycerol Oxidation

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 12, 期 22, 页码 14140-14151

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03919

关键词

selective oxidation of glycerol; CuO-supported Pt nanoparticles; Pt-Cu alloy; hydroxyl adsorption; reaction pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22078007, 22218017]
  2. Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (Innovation Special Project) [79819]
  3. Key Scientific and Technological Project of Luoyang [1901027A]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [buctrc201921, JD2223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, CuO-supported Pt-Cu nanoalloy catalysts were prepared to investigate the effect of Cu species on the reaction pathways for glycerol oxidation in Pt-based catalysts. By adjusting the catalyst structure, control over product selectivity was achieved.
CuO-supported Pt-Cu nanoalloy catalysts were prepared to systematically explore the effect of metal introduction ways on the reaction path in the oxidation of glycerol, taking unsupported Pt-Cu catalysts and supported monometallic Pt catalysts as contrast. PtCu/CuO nanoalloys showed the preferable catalytic activity and high selectivity of dihydroxyacetone (DHA), while unsupported Pt-Cu sol catalysts tended to generate glyceraldehyde (GLD) and glyceric acid (GLA). This change in product distribution was due to the oxidation of the primary hydroxyl group when glycerol adsorbed on the Pt0-Cu0 site in Pt-Cu sol catalysts. However, in supported Pt-Cu alloy catalysts, owing to the contribution of Cu species in the support, the secondary hydroxyl group of glycerol preferred to adsorb on the Pt0-CuII sites with lower transition state energy for oxidation, responsible for higher DHA selectivity. This work provides a fundamental understanding on the effect of Cu species and its origin in Pt-based catalysts on the reaction pathways for glycerol oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据