4.8 Article

Phonon downconversion to suppress correlated errors in superconducting qubits

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33997-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Government under ARO [W911NF-18-1-0106]
  2. National Science Foundation [NNCI-2025233]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers achieve a suppression of correlated error rate by channeling high-energy particle impacts caused by background radiation away from the qubits via a thick metal layer at the bottom of the chip. They also use a pump-probe scheme to monitor the parity of quasiparticles on qubit chips and observe a significant reduction in correlated poisoning.
Quantum error correction can preserve quantum information in the presence of local errors, but correlated errors are fatal. For superconducting qubits, high-energy particle impacts from background radioactivity produce energetic phonons that travel throughout the substrate and create excitations above the superconducting ground state, known as quasiparticles, which can poison all qubits on the chip. We use normal metal reservoirs on the chip back side to downconvert phonons to low energies where they can no longer poison qubits. We introduce a pump-probe scheme involving controlled injection of pair-breaking phonons into the qubit chips. We examine quasiparticle poisoning on chips with and without back-side metallization and demonstrate a reduction in the flux of pair-breaking phonons by over a factor of 20. We use a Ramsey interferometer scheme to simultaneously monitor quasiparticle parity on three qubits for each chip and observe a two-order of magnitude reduction in correlated poisoning due to background radiation. High-energy particle impacts due to background or cosmic radiation have been identified as sources of correlated errors in superconducting qubit arrays. Iaia et al. achieve a suppression of correlated error rate by channeling the energy away from the qubits via a thick metal layer at the bottom of the chip.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据