4.8 Article

A blind benchmark of analysis tools to infer kinetic rate constants from single-molecule FRET trajectories

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33023-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [431471305]
  2. SNF [200020_165868, 200020_192153]
  3. UZH
  4. University of Applied Sciences Mittweida [SFB1381]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [403222702 - SFB 1381, P400PB_180889]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. US National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) [1R15HG009972]
  8. Case Western Reserve University College of Arts and Sciences
  9. NIH [1P20GM130451, 2R01MH0 81923-11A1, NSF 1749778]
  10. Institutes Organization of the Dutch Research Council
  11. Carlsberg foundation Distinguished associate professor program [CF16-0797]
  12. Vellux foundation center of excellence BIONEC [18333]
  13. NovoNordisk foundation [NNF14CC00001, NNF16OC0021948]
  14. European Research Council [671208]
  15. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_165868, 200020_192153, P400PB_180889] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  16. European Research Council (ERC) [671208] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we compared the performance of 11 analysis tools in inferring kinetic rate constants from smFRET trajectories. The results highlight the current strengths and limitations in inferring kinetic information from smFRET data and provide recommendations for future developments.
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) is a versatile technique to study the dynamics and function of biomolecules since it makes nanoscale movements detectable as fluorescence signals. The powerful ability to infer quantitative kinetic information from smFRET data is, however, complicated by experimental limitations. Diverse analysis tools have been developed to overcome these hurdles but a systematic comparison is lacking. Here, we report the results of a blind benchmark study assessing eleven analysis tools used to infer kinetic rate constants from smFRET trajectories. We test them against simulated and experimental data containing the most prominent difficulties encountered in analyzing smFRET experiments: different noise levels, varied model complexity, non-equilibrium dynamics, and kinetic heterogeneity. Our results highlight the current strengths and limitations in inferring kinetic information from smFRET trajectories. In addition, we formulate concrete recommendations and identify key targets for future developments, aimed to advance our understanding of biomolecular dynamics through quantitative experiment-derived models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据