4.8 Article

Molecular basis for isoform-selective inhibition of presenilin-1 by MRK-560

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33817-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0509300]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81920108015]
  4. Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province [2020C04001]
  5. Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the isoform-dependent sensitivity of gamma-secretase containing Presenilin isoforms (PS1 and PS2) to the inhibitor MRK-560. Cryo-EM structures of PS1/PS2 complexes treated with MRK-560 were determined, and key residues responsible for the isoform-dependent selectivity were identified.
Inhibition of gamma-secretase activity represents a potential therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease (AD). MRK-560 is a selective inhibitor with higher potency for Presenilin 1 (PS1) than for PS2, the two isoforms of the catalytic subunit of gamma-secretase, although the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of PS1 and PS2-containing gamma-secretase complexes with and without MRK-560 at overall resolutions of 2.9-3.4 angstrom. MRK-560 occupies the substrate binding site of PS1, but is invisible in PS2. Structural comparison identifies Thr281 and Leu282 in PS1 to be the determinant for isoform-dependent sensitivity to MRK-560, which is confirmed by swapping experiment between PS1 and PS2. By revealing the mechanism for isoform-selective inhibition of presenilin, our work may facilitate future drug discovery targeting gamma-secretase. Presenilin isoforms (PS1 and PS2) containing gamma-secretase show contrasting sensitivity to MRK-560. Here, the authors determined cryo-EM structures of PS1/PS2-complexes treated with MRK-560 and identified key residues responsible for the isoform-dependent selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据