4.8 Article

Complex genomic patterns of abasic sites in mammalian DNA revealed by a high-resolution SSiNGLe-AP method

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33594-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32170619]
  2. Research Fund for International Senior Scientists from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32150710525]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China [2020J02006]
  4. Scientific Research Funds of Huaqiao University [15BS101, 600005-Z17Y0043]
  5. National Science Foundation of China [32000476]
  6. Youth Innovation Grant of Xiamen, Fujian Province, China [3502Z20206015]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Huaqiao University [ZQN-922]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a high-resolution method, SSiNGLe-AP, to map abasic (AP) sites in mammalian genomes. The results show that AP sites are nonrandomly distributed in the genome and are influenced by gene expression, age, and tissue type.
DNA damage plays a critical role in biology and diseases; however, how different types of DNA lesions affect cellular functions is far from clear mostly due to the paucity of high-resolution methods that can map their locations in complex genomes, such as those of mammals. Here, we present the development and validation of SSiNGLe-AP method, which can map a common type of DNA damage, abasic (AP) sites, in a genome-wide and high-resolution manner. We apply this method to six different tissues of mice with different ages and human cancer cell lines. We find a nonrandom distribution of AP sites in the mammalian genome that exhibits dynamic enrichment at specific genomic locations, including single-nucleotide hotspots, and is significantly influenced by gene expression, age and tissue type in particular. Overall, these results suggest that we are only starting to understand the true complexities in the genomic patterns of DNA damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据