4.8 Article

Triple ionization and fragmentation of benzene trimers following ultrafast intermolecular Coulombic decay

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33032-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11974272, 11774281, 12074143]
  2. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics (Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intermolecular interactions involving aromatic rings are important in biochemistry and organic materials. However, our understanding of the structures and dynamics of aromatic clusters, especially beyond dimers, is still incomplete. In this study, we investigate the fragmentation dynamics of benzene trimers and provide detailed insights using ion momentum spectroscopy, ab-initio calculations, and laser experiments.
Intermolecular interactions involving aromatic rings are ubiquitous in biochemistry and they govern the properties of many organic materials. Nevertheless, our understanding of the structures and dynamics of aromatic clusters remains incomplete, in particular for systems beyond the dimers, despite their high presence in many macromolecular systems such as DNA and proteins. Here, we study the fragmentation dynamics of benzene trimer that represents a prototype of higher-order aromatic clusters. The trimers are initially ionized by electron-collision with the creation of a deep-lying carbon 2s(-1) state or one outer-valence and one inner-valence vacancies at two separate molecules. The system can thus relax via ultrafast intermolecular decay mechanisms, leading to the formation of C6H6+center dot C6H6+center dot C6H6+ trications and followed by a concerted three-body Coulomb explosion. Triple-coincidence ion momentum spectroscopy, accompanied by ab-initio calculations and further supported by strong-field laser experiments, allows us to elucidate the details on the fragmentation dynamics of benzene trimers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据