4.3 Review

Robocasting Additive Manufacturing of Titanium and Titanium Alloys: A Review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12666-022-02755-7

关键词

Direct ink writing; Metallic porous structure; Scaffold; Additive manufacturing; 3D printing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robocasting, also known as Direct Ink Writing, is an emerging additive manufacturing technology for titanium and its alloys. It uses a material extrusion method and requires the removal of binder before sintering. Currently, it has been successfully used to fabricate small porous titanium structures for applications such as bone repair and catalyst supports. While progress in robocasting of titanium materials is modest, it shows promising potential for advanced titanium applications.
Robocasting, also known as Direct Ink Writing, is emerging as an additive manufacturing technology for titanium and its alloys. It is a material extrusion method that deposits a suspension of titanium particles (ink) to fabricate structures designed in silico. The structures are made of unbounded titanium particles and require sintering to become a continuous mechanically stable solid. The removal of the binder is a very important operation performed before sintering to satisfy the chemical, mechanical, and metallurgical specifications of the titanium standards. Currently, relatively small porous titanium structures have been fabricated by robocasting, mainly for bone repair applications but also for catalyst supports. Progress in the robocasting of titanium and its alloys is modest but promising, offering opportunities with significant impact in advanced titanium applications. This review presents the state of the art of robocasting of titanium metallic materials, as well as discusses the mechanical properties and current applications of manufactured parts. The review also provides an overview of current challenges and limitations and offers guidelines for the new directions that future research and technology development can take in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据