4.1 Review

Upfront therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: looking beyond R-CHOP

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 805-812

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2124156

关键词

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; molecular subtypes; clusters; polatuzumab vedotin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a collection of malignancies with distinct molecular features. Recent studies have identified at least five different subtypes of DLBCL, further categorizing previously recognized subtypes. Clinical trials using novel therapeutic agents to improve outcomes have been largely unsuccessful.
Introduction Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not a single entity but instead represents a collection of interrelated malignancies having distinct molecular features. Recent multiomics studies have independently identified the presence of at least five different subsets of DLBCL, further subcategorizing previously recognized subtypes of this disease. Clinical trials attempting to improve outcomes with the addition of novel therapeutic agents have approached advanced-stage DLBCL as either a single entity or as an overly broad subtype, and have been largely unsuccessful. Areas covered We review, here, in detail the similarities between the novel advanced molecular classification systems. We also review several large phase-3 clinical trials in DLBCL, including those that failed to demonstrate an improvement in outcomes. We explore details of the POLARIX trial data supporting the use of the anti-CD79B antibody drug conjugate (ADC) polatuzumab vedotin. Expert opinion Future efforts to improve the outcomes of frontline treatment of DLBCL patients will require a precision medicine approach in which individual-targeted agents are used to treat patients with specific subgroups of DLBCL, based on molecular features. This will require a validated molecular assay with results available in real-time and coordinated effort by academic clinical investigators and industry partners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据