4.2 Article

Band depth based initialization of K-means for functional data clustering

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11634-022-00510-w

关键词

k-Means; Modified Band Depth; B-spline; functional data; bootstrap

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The k-Means algorithm is a popular choice for clustering data, but it is known to be sensitive to the initialization process. This paper introduces an extension to the BRIk algorithm for longitudinal data, which clusters centroids derived from bootstrap replicates of the data and utilizes the Modified Band Depth. The proposed approach enhances the BRIk method by fitting B-splines to observations and incorporating a resampling process, resulting in improved effectiveness in providing initial seeds for k-Means clustering.
The k-Means algorithm is one of the most popular choices for clustering data but is well-known to be sensitive to the initialization process. There is a substantial number of methods that aim at finding optimal initial seeds for k-Means, though none of them is universally valid. This paper presents an extension to longitudinal data of one of such methods, the BRIk algorithm, that relies on clustering a set of centroids derived from bootstrap replicates of the data and on the use of the versatile Modified Band Depth. In our approach we improve the BRIk method by adding a step where we fit appropriate B-splines to our observations and a resampling process that allows computational feasibility and handling issues such as noise or missing data. We have derived two techniques for providing suitable initial seeds, each of them stressing respectively the multivariate or the functional nature of the data. Our results with simulated and real data sets indicate that our Functional Data Approach to the BRIK method (FABRIk) and our Functional Data Extension of the BRIK method (FDEBRIk) are more effective than previous proposals at providing seeds to initialize k-Means in terms of clustering recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据