4.7 Article

Structural characterization and immunomodulatory activity of an acidic heteropolysaccharide isolated from the fermented burdock residue mediated by Rhizopus nigricans

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105265

关键词

Burdock fermentation; Rhizopus nigricans; Macrophages; Structural characterization; Immunomodulatory activity

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0902000]
  2. Major Program of Shandong Province (the Key Technology) [2015ZDJS04002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Education Department of Anhui Province [KJ2018ZD025]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1908085MH248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RBAPS, an acidic heteropolysaccharide extracted from Rhizopus nigricans mediated burdock residue fermentation, showed immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effects in vitro. RBAPS promoted cell proliferation and phagocytosis, inhibited cell apoptosis, and induced cytokine secretion in macrophages. It also promoted M1 macrophage transformation and induced the secretion of NO and IL-6.
An acidic heteropolysaccharide (RBAPS) with a relative molecular weight of 140.9 kDa was extracted from Rhizopus nigricans mediated burdock residue fermentation. Structural analysis indicated that RBAPS was mainly composed of Rha, Ara, Gal, GalA, GlcA, Glc and Xyl in a molar ratio of 14.5: 14.3: 30.1: 31.0: 5.5: 0.8: 3.8. The dominant backbone of RBAPS consisted of alpha-Rhap, alpha-GalAp, and alpha-Galp with the branched chains of beta-Galp and alpha-Araf. In macrophage RAW264.7 cells, RBAPS promoted proliferation, enhanced phagocytosis, hindered apoptosis, and promoted cytokines (NO, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-1 beta) secretion. RBAPS also promoted M1 macrophage transformation and induced the secretion of NO and IL-6 in differentiated macrophages. The findings suggested that RBAPS has the potential immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effects, giving it application prospect in the health and pharmaceutical fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据