4.5 Article

A toolkit for open and pluralistic conservation science

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Editorial Material Biodiversity Conservation

The statistics wars and intellectual conflicts of interest

Deborah G. Mayo

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2022)

Editorial Material Biology

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process

Alexandru Marcoci et al.

Summary: Journal peer review plays an important role in regulating the flow of ideas in academic disciplines. However, research shows that editors cannot accurately identify the best experts for peer review. To prevent biases and uneven power distributions, introducing greater transparency and structure into the process is crucial.

BMC RESEARCH NOTES (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

The challenge of biased evidence in conservation

Alec P. Christie et al.

Summary: Efforts to address the current biodiversity crisis need to prioritize the generation of evidence by identifying biases and gaps in conservation literature. The majority of studies are concentrated in Western Europe and North America, highlighting the need for more research on conservation actions for amphibians and birds in other regions.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Environmental Studies

Opening the black box of conservation philanthropy: A co-produced research agenda on private foundations in marine conservation

Rebecca L. Gruby et al.

Summary: This paper highlights the increasing importance of marine conservation philanthropy in the current 'new Gilded Age'. Through a research co-design process involving various stakeholders, 137 unique research questions were identified and grouped into five thematic research priorities, with a focus on issues of legitimacy, justice, and best practices that cut across all themes.

MARINE POLICY (2021)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism

Unai Pascual et al.

Summary: The lack of progress in reversing the declining global trend in biodiversity is partly due to a mismatch in how living nature is conceived and valued, leading to hindrances in protecting biodiversity. Addressing this problem calls for a pluralistic perspective on biodiversity, considering the use of the concept, willingness to expand its ambit, and engagement with various drivers of change.

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Strengthening conservation science as a crisis discipline by addressing challenges of precaution, privilege, and individualism

Andy Stirling et al.

Summary: The article discusses key drivers and effects of resistance to precautionary measures in conservation science, including a loss of rigor under uncertainty, erosion of crisis response capabilities, and further reinforcement of privileged interests in conservation politics. The authors recommend measures to resist competitive individualism and shift towards more egalitarian transdisciplinarity to accelerate advances in conservation science.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2021)

Editorial Material Environmental Sciences

Toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods

Colin L. Soskolne et al.

Summary: Epidemiology plays a crucial role in understanding health and disease, but its methods and language can be manipulated and misused. A toolkit has been created to help professionals detect bias and flaws in scientific studies related to public health. It is important to address financial conflicts of interest and improper study design to ensure transparency and validity in epidemiological research.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (2021)

Editorial Material Ecology

Making ecology really global

Martin A. Nunez et al.

Summary: Ecology needs to thrive globally, but there are inequalities in knowledge production and exchange. Recognizing and addressing these inequalities, while embracing geographical and cultural diversity, is the first step towards solutions.

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database

William J. Sutherland et al.

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution

Hannah Fraser et al.

PLOS ONE (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The preregistration revolution

Brian A. Nosek et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)

Review Ecology

Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency

Timothy H. Parker et al.

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2018)

Editorial Material Medicine, Research & Experimental

Making the scientific literature fail-safe

Arturo Casadevall et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Five ways to fix statistics

NATURE (2017)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation

Nathan J. Bennett et al.

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2017)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics

Colin F. Camerer et al.

SCIENCE (2016)

Editorial Material Environmental Sciences

Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: what progress has been made?

Kathleen Ruff

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (2015)

Editorial Material Biodiversity Conservation

What is conservation?

Chris Sandbrook

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Alexander A. Aarts et al.

SCIENCE (2015)

Review Development Studies

How Collaborative Approaches to Environmental Problem Solving View Indigenous Peoples: A Systematic Review

Suzanne von der Porten et al.

SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES (2014)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems

David A. Keith et al.

PLOS ONE (2013)

Article Biology

What Is Conservation Science?

Peter Kareiva et al.

BIOSCIENCE (2012)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

C. Glenn Begley et al.

NATURE (2012)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Less is more: the potential of qualitative approaches in conservation research

R. Drury et al.

ANIMAL CONSERVATION (2011)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment

Mark Burgman et al.

CONSERVATION LETTERS (2011)

Article Education, Scientific Disciplines

Evaluating the Effects That Existing Instruction on Responsible Conduct of Research Has on Ethical Decision Making

Alison L. Antes et al.

ACADEMIC MEDICINE (2010)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Assessing ethical trade-offs in ecological field studies

Kirsten M. Parris et al.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2010)