4.4 Article

Inter-sectoral prioritization of climate technologies: insights from a Technology Needs Assessment for mitigation in Brazil

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-022-10025-6

关键词

Brazil; Technology Needs Assessment; Mitigation; Multi-criteria analysis; Analytic hierarchy process

资金

  1. Green Climate Fund (GCF)
  2. National Institute of Science and Technology for Climate Change Phase 2 under CNPq [465501/2014-1]
  3. FAPESP [2014/50848-9, 2018/17714-0]
  4. National Coordination for High Level Education and Training (CAPES) [16/2014]
  5. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technological development is crucial for achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement. Technology Needs Assessments (TNAs) are conducted to identify and prioritize climate change mitigation and adaptation technologies in developing countries. However, there is a lack of literature discussing country-specific processes for TNAs. This paper presents empirical evidence from a tailored TNA project in Brazil, highlighting the importance of country-driven processes in shaping international programs according to specific national needs and capabilities.
Technological development is key for national strategies to cope with the Paris Agreement's goals. Technology Needs Assessments (TNAs) aim to identify, prioritize, and diffuse climate change mitigation and/or adaptation technologies in developing countries. Their methodology includes a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework but, although many countries already conducted a TNA, literature lacks discussions on country-specific processes for a TNA, as it usually follows a one-size-fits-all approach. This paper provides empirical evidence on the importance of country-driven processes that help shaping international programmes into country-specific needs and capabilities. It presents lessons learned from a tailored process for identification, prioritization, and selection of mitigation technologies in the scope of a TNA project for Brazil, an exceptional case of a developing country with strong capacity in integrated assessment modelling (IAM) scenarios for guiding its climate strategies. A previous IAM scenario result allowed pre-selecting technologies in six key economic sectors, while other TNAs prioritized no more than three. This allowed the elaboration of an overall ranking from the MCDA, in contrast to sectoral rankings that are mostly employed in other countries' TNAs. The overall ranking serves not only as a basis for the selection of priority technologies but also provides information on the integrated innovations framework for climate technologies in the country. Further specific findings of the tailored Brazilian TNA approach are discussed in the paper in order to call for the importance that a technology transfer project should not only be country-driven but also conducted through a country-specific process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据