4.3 Article

Description of a new species of Hamamelistes forming galls on Fothergilla spp. (Hamamelidaceae) and the generic limits of Hormaphidini (Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae: Hormaphidinae)

期刊

ZOOTAXA
卷 5183, 期 1, 页码 203-219

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5183.1.16

关键词

Aphid; Betula; DNA barcode; Hamamelis; host alternation; witch-alder

类别

资金

  1. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station [9483]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hamamelistes and Hormaphis aphids are distributed in eastern North America and Eurasia. Host-alternating species have life cycles on witch-hazel and birch. In this study, a new undescribed species of Hamamelistes was discovered in Alabama, USA. The morphology and DNA sequence confirmed its classification. The authors recommend restricting the tribe Hormaphidini to Hamamelistes and Hormaphis.
Hamamelistes and Hormaphis aphids of the tribe Hormaphidini are distributed disjunctly in eastern North America and Eurasia. Host-alternating species have life cycles encompassing generations in a gall on witch-hazel (Hamamelis spp.) and generations on leaves of birch (Betula spp.). In Hamamelistes, generations on witch-hazel induce globular pouch galls on flower or leaf buds. Herbarium specimens of a related Hamamelidaceae genus, Fothergilla, contain large galls in place of the seed head. We obtained a fresh sample of these elongate pouch galls collected from F. milleri in Alabama, USA. The galls were formed in place of fruiting structures and contained numerous aphids. Examination of morphology and the cytochrome oxidase subunit I barcode DNA sequence confirmed that the aphids are an undescribed species of Hamamelistes. Here, we describe the new species, Hamamelistes blackmani Dederich & von Dohlen sp. n., from the morphology of foundresses, immatures, and winged forms in the gall. The life cycle is presumed monoecious. In addition, we review the evidence for including other genera in Hormaphidini and recommend that this tribe be restricted to Hamamelistes and Hormaphis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据