4.1 Article

Phase formation studies and crystal structure refinements in the MnII/TeIV/O/(H) system

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.202200205

关键词

preparation methods; manganese; tellurium; crystal structure determination; crystal chemistry; structural comparison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systematic studies in the Mn-II/Te-IV/O/-(H) system led to the successful synthesis of five manganese(II) oxidotellurate(IV) compounds. The crystal structures of these compounds were determined, and their relationships with other known compounds were analyzed.
Systematic phase formation studies in the system Mn-II/Te-IV/O/-(H) using either solid-state reactions between stoichiometric MnO:TeO2 mixtures or hydrothermal reactions under basic conditions led to crystal growth of two polymorphs (alpha-, gamma-) of MnTeO3, Mn6Te5O16, Mn-15(TeO3)(14)(OH)(2) and Mn-3(TeO3)(2)(OH)(2). Although alpha-MnTeO3 and Mn6Te5O16 have been reported previously, crystal structure refinements were missing so far. Whereas alpha-MnTeO3 crystallizes in a unique structure (space group Pbca, Z=16), Mn6Te5O16 (Pnma, Z=4) is isotypic with its Co-homologue. The previously unknown phases gamma-MnTeO3 (Pbca, Z=8), Mn-15(TeO3)(14)(OH)(2) (R3? , Z=3) and Mn-3(TeO3)(2)(OH)(2) (P6(3)mc, Z=4) all have isotypic relationships, namely with ZnTeO3, Co-15(TeO3)(14)F-2 and M-3(TeO3)(2)(OH)(2) (M=Ni, Co), respectively. Common to all crystal structures of the five manganese(II) oxidotellurate(IV) phases is the presence of [MnO5] or [MnO6] polyhedra and isolated trigonal-pyramidal [TeO3] groups (except for one of the Te-IV atoms in Mn6Te5O16 [TeO4] bisphenoids) as principal building units, which share corners and edges with the [MnO5/6] groups. The resulting three-dimensional frameworks are dominated by the influence of the stereochemically active 5 s(2) electron lone pair situated at the Te-IV atom, leading to the formation of channels or interstices. Quantitative comparisons between the corresponding isotypic crystal structures are given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据