4.4 Article

Evaluation of Media Conductivity and a Combination of Iodine and Sodium Hypochlorite Surface Disinfection on Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryo Viability and Morphology

期刊

ZEBRAFISH
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 190-199

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2022.0028

关键词

zebrafish; conductivity; sodium hypochlorite; iodine; embryo disinfection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of consecutive use of iodine and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants on zebrafish embryo survival and development was evaluated. It was found that using NaOCl disinfectant in media with high conductivity decreased survival rate, but consecutive use of iodine and NaOCl ensured a certain level of survival rate.
Embryo surface disinfection in either an iodine or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution is commonly performed on imported zebrafish embryos to decrease pathogen introduction into a facility. The impact of the consecutive use of these disinfectants and the conductivity of the culture media on embryo survival and development post-disinfection have not been evaluated. Iodine (12.5-25 ppm) is effective at eliminating several Mycobacterium species, whereas NaOCl (50-100 ppm) reduces the number of viable Pseudoloma neurophilia spores. Casper and T5D (tropical 5D wild type) embryos reared in media of differing conductivities (0-10, 100-200, 750-950, and 1500-2000 mu S) with and without exposure to NaOCl 100 ppm at 6 h post-fertilization were evaluated for survival, hatching success, and morphological defects at 5 days post-fertilization. Additionally, the consecutive use of iodine (12.5 ppm for 2 min) followed by NaOCl (75 or 100 ppm for 10 min), as well as the inverse, was evaluated. Embryo survival was not impacted by embryo rearing media alone; however, survival significantly decreased when embryos were disinfected with 100 ppm NaOCl in media with a conductivity >750-950 mu S. Iodine (12 ppm) and NaOCl (75 ppm) used sequentially resulted in >50% survival, whereas the use of 100 ppm NaOCl resulted in high levels of embryo mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据