4.5 Article

Numerical Chebyshev finite difference examination of Lorentz force effect on a dissipative flow with variable thermal conductivity and magnetic heating: Entropy generation minimization

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/zamm.202200010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Applied Mathematics Shenzhen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a computational analysis of entropy generation minimization in a dissipative flow of viscous fluid. The highest production of entropy occurs at the surface of the elastic boundary. There is a positive correlation between temperature and entropy with the Eckert number and magnetic parameter.
This work presents the computational analysis of entropy generation minimization in a dissipative flow of viscous fluid. The flow is produced by a non-linearly elastic surface under the influence of the variable magnetic field. The non-isothermal boundary condition is chosen such that all the embedding flow control parameters are free from the space variables. It is supposed that the working fluid's thermal conductivity is temperature-dependent. The heating term corresponding to the magnetic dissipation effect is also added to the energy equation. The governing energy and momentum equations are simplified by similarity transformations and numerically solved using Chebyshev Finite Difference Scheme (ChFDS). Volumetric entropy generation in dimensionless form is also obtained via similarity transformations. The obtained solutions are also utilized for calculating entropy and Bejan numbers. It has been noticed that the production of entropy is highest at the surface of the elastic boundary. The temperature and entropy have increasing relation with the Eckert number and magnetic parameter. Further, an inverse relation is observed between the entropy generation and temperature difference parameter. The consequences of relevant parameters on the velocity, temperature, entropy and Bejan number are visually described and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据