4.3 Article

Calibrating vision: Concepts and questions

期刊

VISION RESEARCH
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108131

关键词

Calibration; Adaptation; Compensation; Development; Visual coding; Plasticity

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [772193]
  2. NIH [EY-031166, EY-030578, EY-010834, CA-237827]
  3. Medical Research Council [EY-010834]
  4. Stavros Niarchos Foundation/Research to Prevent Blindness
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [772193] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews various aspects and issues surrounding the general concept of calibration in visual processing, with a focus on the plasticity within the encoding and representational stages. It suggests unresolved questions and emphasizes the importance of ongoing calibrations in vision.
The idea that visual coding and perception are shaped by experience and adjust to changes in the environment or the observer is universally recognized as a cornerstone of visual processing, yet the functions and processes mediating these calibrations remain in many ways poorly understood. In this article we review a number of facets and issues surrounding the general notion of calibration, with a focus on plasticity within the encoding and representational stages of visual processing. These include how many types of calibrations there are - and how we decide; how plasticity for encoding is intertwined with other principles of sensory coding; how it is instantiated at the level of the dynamic networks mediating vision; how it varies with development or between individuals; and the factors that may limit the form or degree of the adjustments. Our goal is to give a small glimpse of an enormous and fundamental dimension of vision, and to point to some of the unresolved questions in our understanding of how and why ongoing calibrations are a pervasive and essential element of vision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据