4.5 Article

Dynamics analysis of train-track-bridge coupled system considering spatial flexibility of high piers and system longitudinal vibrations

期刊

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
卷 61, 期 10, 页码 2613-2637

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2022.2124178

关键词

High-speed railway; high piers; train-track-bridge interaction; longitudinal vibration; spatial flexibility; train braking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a 3D train-slab track-high pier bridge coupled dynamics model was established and verified, considering the spatial flexibility of high piers. The results show that the operation speed has a significant impact on carbody acceleration and wheel-rail force.
High-pier railway bridges are mostly applied in mountainous areas. Due to the large spatial flexibility of the high piers under train dynamic loads, especially under braking conditions, the wheel-rail (WR) dynamic interaction may become more intense in the longitudinal direction, which could induce larger deformation and impact on the train-track-bridge (TTB) coupled system. To investigate the dynamic characteristics of such complex and large system during train braking condition, a 3D train-slab track-high pier bridge (TTHPB) coupled dynamics model is established and verified by considering the system longitudinal vibrations and the spatial flexibility of high piers. In this work, the influence of concerned bridge height from 60 to 160 m on the dynamic performances of the TTHPB system under train braking condition is studied. Results indicate that the operation speed has a significant effect on carbody acceleration and WR force. The longitudinal carbody acceleration due to its high-frequency vibration, as well as its noticeable amplitude induced by the long-time frequent braking, should be carefully considered in the evaluation of riding comfort index. The longitudinal dynamic behaviour of the high pier bridge is considerable and should be paid full attention to in bridge design compared with the other two directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据