4.6 Article

The Garbage Class Mixed Logit Model: Accounting for Low-Quality Response Patterns in Discrete Choice Experiments

期刊

VALUE IN HEALTH
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 1871-1877

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.013

关键词

data quality; discrete choice experiment; garbage class; mixed logit model

资金

  1. EuroQol Research Foundation [1413Ra]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Garbage class mixed logit (MIXL) models provide a convenient alternative to manually screening low-quality respondents in discrete choice experiments. These models achieve the same effect as manual screening but with less effort and ambiguity.
Objectives: To introduce the garbage class mixed logit (MIXL) model as a convenient alternative to manually screening and accounting for respondents with low data quality in discrete choice experiments. Methods: Garbage classes are typically used in latent class logit analyses to designate or identify group(s) of respondents with low data quality. Yet, the same concept can be applied to MIXL models as well. Results: Based on a reanalysis of 4 discrete choice experiments that were originally analyzed using a standard MIXL model, it is shown that garbage class MIXL models can achieve the same effect as manually screening for (and excluding) respondents with low data quality based on the more commonly used root likelihood test, but with less effort and ambiguity. Conclusions: Including a garbage class in MIXL models removes the influence of respondents with a random choice pattern from the MIXL model estimates, provides an estimate of the number of low-quality respondents in the dataset, and avoids having to manually screen for respondents with low data quality based on internal or statistical validity tests. Although less versatile than the combination of standard MIXL estimates with separate assessments of data quality and sensitivity analyses, the proposed garbage class MIXL model provides an attractive alternative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据