4.8 Article

Achieving large dielectric property improvement in polymer/carbon nanotube composites by engineering the nanotube surface via atom transfer radical polymerization

期刊

CARBON
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 895-903

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.020

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51477096, 51277117, 51522703]
  2. Special Fund of the National Priority Basic Research of China [2014CB239503]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [PJ14D018]
  4. SMC Excellent Young faculty Award of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  5. State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment [EIPE15202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High dielectric constant (high-k) polymer composites have many applications in electrical insulation and energy storage systems because of their ease of processing. An important route to high-k polymer composites is to introduce high-aspect-ratio conductive nanoparticles (e.g., carbon nanotubes, CNTs) into a dielectric polymer. However, it is difficult to tune the dielectric properties of the composites via only adjusting the nanoparticle loading, particularly when the conductive nanoparticle concentration is near the percolation threshold. In this work, by using surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization, poly(methyl methacrylate) encapsulated CNTs (PMMA@CNTs) were prepared and used to tune the dielectric properties of PMMA composites. It was found that the PMMA@CNTs can be well dispersed into the PMMA matrix, regardless of the thickness of the PMMA shell grafted onto the CNT surface. The electrical parameters of the composites, such as percolation threshold, electrical conductivity, dielectric constant and dielectric loss tangent, can be tuned by controlling the thickness of the PMMA shell on the CNT surface. High dielectric constant and low dielectric loss can be achieved by adjusting the loading of PMMA@CNTs and the thickness of the PMMA shell on the CNT surface. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据