4.5 Article

A novel multi-epitope recombinant protein elicits an antigen-specific CD8+T cells response in Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice

期刊

VACCINE
卷 40, 期 45, 页码 6445-6449

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.068

关键词

Chagas disease; Trypanosoma cruzi; Multi-epitope; Immunotherapy; CD8+T cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A therapeutic vaccine containing multiple antigenic epitopes has been developed for Chagas disease, showing promising effects in enhancing cellular immune responses and reducing parasite levels. This study provides a potential strategy for the development of a vaccine candidate for Chagas disease.
About 6.5 million people worldwide are afflicted by Chagas disease, which is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. The development of a therapeutic vaccine to prevent the progression of Chagasic cardiomyopathy has been proposed as an alternative for antiparasitic chemotherapy. Bioinformatics tools can predict MHC class I CD8 + epitopes for inclusion in a single recombinant protein with the goal to develop a multivalent vaccine. We expressed a novel recombinant protein Tc24-C4.10E harboring ten nonameric CD8 + epitopes and using Tc24-C4 protein as scaffold to evaluate the therapeu-tic effect in acute T. cruzi infection. T. cruzi-infected mice were immunized with Tc24-C4.10E or Tc24-C4 in a 50-day model of acute infection. Tc24-C4.10E-treated mice showed a decreased parasitemia com-pared to the Tc24-C4 (non-adjuvant) immunized mice or control group. Moreover, Tc24-C4.10E induced a higher stimulation index of CD8 + T cells producing IFNc and IL-4 cytokines. These results suggest that the addition of the MHC Class I epitopes to Tc24-C4 can synergize the antigen-specific cellular immune responses, providing proof-of-concept that this approach could lead to the development of a promising vaccine candidate for Chagas disease. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据