4.5 Article

What a drag: Quantifying the global impact of chronic bottom trawling on continental shelf sediment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 109-119

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.12.007

关键词

Bottom trawling; Continental shelf; Sediment resuspension; Ecosystem; Iberia

资金

  1. DFG Research Center MARUM
  2. U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continental shelves worldwide are subject to intense bottom trawling that causes sediment to be resuspended. The widely used traditional concepts of modern sedimentary transport systems on the shelf rely only on estimates for naturally driven sediment resuspension such as through storm waves, bottom currents, and gravity driven flows but they overlook a critical anthropogenic factor. The strong influence of bottom trawling on a source-to-sink sediment budget is explored on the NW Iberian shelf. Use of Automated Information System vessel tracking data provides for a high-resolution vessel track reconstruction and the accurate calculation of the spatial distribution of bottom trawling intensity and associated resuspended sediment load. The mean bottom trawling-induced resuspended sediment mass for the NW Iberian shelf is 13.50 Mt yr(-1), which leads to a sixfold increase in off-shelf sediment transport when compared to natural resuspension mechanisms. The source to-sink budget analysis provides evidence that bottom trawling causes a rapid erosion of the fine sediment on human time scales. Combining global soft sediment distribution data of the shelves with worldwide bottom trawling intensity estimates we show that the bottom trawling-induced resuspended sediment mass amounts to approximately the same mass of all sediment entering the shelves through rivers. Spatial delineations between natural and anthropogenic sediment resuspension areas are presented to aid in marine management questions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据