4.7 Article

Cavitation erosion by shockwave self-focusing of a single bubble

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106131

关键词

Cavitation; Cavitation erosion; Shock waves

资金

  1. Otto von Guericke university library

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the mechanism behind energy focusing during the non-spherical collapse of cavitation bubbles, leading to the erosion of hardened metals. Using high-speed imaging and shockwave recording, the conditions for this focusing process and its damage to solids are resolved.
The ability of cavitation bubbles to effectively focus energy is made responsible for cavitation erosion, traumatic brain injury, and even for catalyse chemical reactions. Yet, the mechanism through which material is eroded remains vague, and the extremely fast and localized dynamics that lead to material damage has not been resolved. Here, we reveal the decisive mechanism that leads to energy focusing during the non-spherical collapse of cavitation bubbles and eventually results to the erosion of hardened metals. We show that a single cavitation bubble at ambient pressure close to a metal surface causes erosion only if a non-axisymmetric energy self-focusing is at play. The bubble during its collapse emits shockwaves that under certain conditions converge to a single point where the remaining gas phase is driven to a shockwave-intensified collapse. We resolve the conditions under which this self-focusing enhances the collapse and damages the solid. High-speed imaging of bubble and shock wave dynamics at sub-picosecond exposure times is correlated to the shockwaves recorded with large bandwidth hydrophones. The material damage from several metallic materials is detected in situ and quantified ex-situ via scanning electron microscopy and confocal profilometry. With this knowledge, approaches to mitigate cavitation erosion or to even enhance the energy focusing are within reach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据