4.5 Article

Paclitaxel is evidence to reduce growing ovarian follicle growth in mice model study

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105386

关键词

Follicle culture; Follicle development; Follicle survival; Oocytes meiotic competence; Paclitaxel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the effects of paclitaxel on ovarian follicle development and oocyte meiotic competence. The results showed that high dose paclitaxel treatment reduced follicle survival, while lower dose of paclitaxel decreased more growing follicle growth and survival.
We aimed to investigate the effects of paclitaxel on ovarian follicle development and oocyte meiotic competence. Early secondary follicles were cultured individually with or without paclitaxel 2.5 x 10(-10), 2.5 x 10(-9), and 2.5 x 10(-8) M for 12 days. Thereafter, the follicles were treated with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and epidermal growth factor (EGF). Follicle morphology, oocytes meiotic maturation, immunofluorescence for alpha-tubulin of the oocytes, mRNA expression of growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2), and Bcl2-associated X (Bax) were examined every 4, 8, and 12 days of the culture period. We demonstrated that high dose paclitaxel treatment decreased follicle survival (p ( )<= 0.05), while lower dose (2.5 x 10(-9) M) reduced the survival compared to control after 12 days of culture. The number of oocytes at MII stage was not significantly different between control and paclitaxel groups (p > 0.05). Paclitaxel increased GDF9 expression in oocytes after 4 days of the culture (p <= 0.05). Bcl2 declined significantly compared to control after 8 days (p <= 0.05 for all groups), while Bax expression tended to be consistent (p >= 0.05 for all groups). To conclude, high concentration paclitaxel reduces follicle preantral follicle growth, while in lower concentration it decreases more growing follicle growth and survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据