4.4 Article

Copper Catalysts Supported on Barium Deficient Perovskites for CO Oxidation Reaction

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 66, 期 13-14, 页码 895-907

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-022-01716-0

关键词

Perovskite; Copper; Manganese; CO oxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of CuX/Ba0.7MnO3 catalysts were synthesized, characterized and tested for CO oxidation reaction. It was found that Cu-free perovskite was the most active catalyst, while Cu-containing catalysts showed higher activity at higher CO concentrations. Cu4/Ba0.7MnO3 and Cu12/Ba0.7MnO3 catalysts exhibited more active sites and demonstrated high stability and recyclability during the reaction.
Mixed oxides with perovskite-type structure (ABO(3)) present interesting physico-chemical properties to be used as catalyst for atmospheric pollution control. In this work, a series of CuX/Ba0.7MnO3 catalysts (being x: 0, 4, 8 and 12 wt%) has been synthesized, characterized and tested for CO oxidation reaction. All the catalysts were active for CO oxidation in the two reactant mixtures tested: low CO mixture (0.1% CO and 1% O-2 in He) and near stoichiometric mixture (1% CO and 1% O-2 in He). Copper-free perovskite is the most active catalyst in the less demanding conditions (0.1% CO and 1% O-2), as it presents the highest amount of oxygen vacancies working as active sites. However, at higher CO concentrations (1% CO in near stoichiometric mixture), copper-containing catalysts were more active than the perovskite support because, due to the saturation of the oxygen vacancies of perovskites, CuO seems to participate as active site for CO and O-2 activation. Cu4/Ba0.7MnO3 and Cu12/Ba0.7MnO3 are more active than Cu8/Ba0.7MnO3 catalyst, since they present a larger amount of active sites on surface. These two copper-containing catalysts present a high stability and recyclability during the reaction at 300 degrees C in an ideal near stoichiometric mixture (1% CO and 1% O-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据