4.0 Article

Modification in Response of a Bridge Seismically Isolated with Lead Rubber Bearings Exposed to Low Temperature

期刊

TEKNIK DERGI
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 12553-12576

出版社

TURKISH CHAMBER CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.18400/tekderg.880787

关键词

Seismic isolation; lead rubber bearing; low temperature; lead core heating; bridge

资金

  1. Commission of Scientific Research Projects, Eskisehir Technical University [1505F460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the response modification of a bridge using lead rubber bearings (LRBs) under different ambient temperatures. The results show that the isolator force remains almost the same at different temperatures, but the property modification factor overestimates the isolator force in an average sense.
This study investigates the response modification in a bridge seismically isolated with lead rubber bearings (LRBs), due to change of ambient temperature from 20 degrees C to -30 degrees C. Accordingly, a large-size LRB was tested after being conditioned at corresponding temperatures and changes in its hysteretic properties were noted. Use of analytical tool in modeling nonlinear response of the tested LRB was justified by comparing the experimentally observed and analytically obtained force-displacement curves. Then, verified analytical representation of an LRB was employed in nonlinear response history analyses conducted to quantify the change in response of a representative LRB isolated bridge when subjected to bidirectional ground motion excitations at 20 degrees C and -30 degrees C. Analyses results are also employed to assess the use of property modification factor, lambda, to change isolator properties in order to represent low temperature behavior. It is revealed that for the selected ground motion records, the average isolator force remains almost the same for both ambient temperatures. Moreover, using property modification factor will result in accurately estimated isolator displacements, but overestimated isolator forces, in an average sense.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据