4.5 Article

New SKS splitting anisotropy measurements point to tearing beneath Central Italy

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 840, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229549

关键词

Seismic anisotropy; Mantle flows; Geodynamic model; Apennines; Central Mediterranean

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research [CUP D53J19000170001]
  2. NEWTON (NEw Window inTO Earth's iNterior), ERC StG [758199]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [758199] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a new seismic anisotropy dataset is described for Central Italy. The new measurements reveal changes in the fast polarisation directions and the presence of mantle flow from the Adriatic Sea to the Tyrrhenian Sea.
In the middle of the Mediterranean, the partly still active Apennines subduction system has been usually defined using tomographic images and available shear wave splitting measurements. In this paper we describe the new seismic anisotropy dataset for Central Italy, the region where the transition between Northern and Southern Apennines occurs. The new measurements show NW-SE fast polarisation directions beneath the belt, due to the retreat of the slab, NNE-SSW orientations from proper Adriatic mantle sources, and E-W directed anisotropy, attributed to mantle convection flow at the Thyrranian side. Additionally, the new data suggest the presence of a toroidal mantle flow through a tear in the Apenninic slab, from the Adria to the Tyrrhenian side. However, mantle circulation and flows, identified by the pattern of shear wave splitting results, seem different from what was proposed in previous geodynamic models. Indeed, our results support the presence of a vertical slab tear with limited dimension. In the geodynamic model we propose, the tear acts to accommodate a differential slab retreat. The slab partitioning results in a different pattern and strength of seismic anisotropy traced from the Central Apennines with respect to the adjacent Northern and Southern Apennines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据