4.7 Review

Small failure probability: principles, progress and perspectives

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-022-03431-6

关键词

Extreme value statistics; High reliability; Machine learning; Rare event; Sampling; Small failure probability; Surrogate model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a review of approaches for estimating small probability in structural or multidisciplinary systems and suggests criteria for choosing the preferred approach. The approaches are categorized into sampling-based, surrogate-based, and statistics of extremes based methods. Methods for time-independent and time-dependent systems are discussed separately. Real-life engineering applications are summarized and future research directions are suggested.
Design of structural and multidisciplinary systems under uncertainties requires estimation of their reliability or equivalently the probability of failure under the given operating conditions. Various high technology systems including aircraft and nuclear power plants are designed for very small probabilities of failure, and estimation of these small probabilities is computationally challenging. Even though substantial number of approaches have been proposed to reduce the computational burden, there is no established guideline to decide which approach is the best choice for a given problem. This paper provides a review of the approaches developed for small probability estimation of structural or multidisciplinary systems and enlists the criterion/metrics to choose the preferred approach amongst the existing ones, for a given problem. First, the existing approaches are categorized into the sampling-based, the surrogate-based, and statistics of extremes based approaches. Next, the small probability estimation methods developed for time-independent systems and the ones tailored for time-dependent systems are discussed, respectively. Then, some real-life engineering applications in structural and multidisciplinary design studies are summarized. Finally, concluding remarks are provided, and areas for future research are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据