4.6 Article

Analysis of electrospinning and additive effect on β phase content of electrospun PVDF nanofiber mats for piezoelectric energy harvester nanogenerators

期刊

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665X/ac8f78

关键词

PVDF nanofiber; electrospinning; energy harvesting; beta crystal phase; design of experiment

资金

  1. Konya Technical University Coordinatorship of Scientific Research Project (BAP) [201116073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving the piezoelectric properties of PVDF by using additives, a composite PVDF nanofiber mat with the highest beta phase concentration was produced. It demonstrated a higher output voltage than pure PVDF under equal electrospinning conditions.
Harvesting energy with piezoelectric nanoparticles enables the development of self-powered devices. Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF) has been widely used in a variety of fields due to its superior piezoelectric properties. PVDF's piezoelectric performance is affected by the presence of polar phase in the crystalline structure. The electrospinning process was used in this study to achieve high beta phase ratios in the PVDF crystalline structure using various additives (graphene, boron nitride, and quartz (SiO2)). The Taguchi experimental design method was used to determine the most significant parameters affecting phase content from seven factors, as well as the optimal levels of the significant factors. The Fourier transform infrared, x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray and differential scanning calorimetry analyses were used to characterize the composite PVDF nanofiber mats produced under optimal conditions, and the output voltage was measured using an oscilloscope. The composite PVDF nanofiber mat with the highest beta phase concentration demonstrated a maximum output voltage of 8.68 V under optimal conditions, indicating that it outperformed than pure PVDF under equal electrospinning conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据