4.7 Article

Catalytic selective separation of chloride ions from acidic wastewater

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122502

关键词

Catalytic hydrogenation; Oxygenation; Capacitive-faradaic fuel cells; Anions-capture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new two-step technique was developed for selectively separating chloride ions from acidic aqueous solutions. The process operates at ambient temperature and pressure, and is powered by H2 gas and atmospheric oxygen. The Pt-Ag-AC catalyst composed of activated carbon loaded with platinum nano size crystals and metallic silver particles, enables the oxidation of Ag0 to Ag+ and the subsequent formation of insoluble AgCl precipitate on the catalyst through the aeration of acidic chloride solution. The regeneration of the Pt-AgCl-AC is achieved through hydrogenation, leading to the reduction of AgCl into Ag0 and the release of Cl- ions.
A new two-step technique was developed for selective separation of chloride ions from acidic aqueous solutions. The process is operated at ambient temperature and pressure, and it is powered by H2 gas and atmospheric oxygen. The Pt-Ag-AC catalyst comprises activated carbon (AC) loaded with platinum (Pt) nano size crystals and metallic silver (Ag) particles. The aeration of acidic chloride solution results in the oxidation of Ag0 to Ag+, which in turn reacts with chloride ions to form an insoluble AgCl precipitate on the catalyst. The regeneration of the Pt-AgCl-AC is performed by hydrogenation, that leads to reduction of AgCl into Ag0, followed by the release of Cl- ions. The process was studied in a batch mode system using acidic NaCl-H2SO4 solutions (500 mgCl/L, [H2SO4]0 = 0.5 M) and Pt-Ag-AC made of granular activated charcoal. The carbon was loaded with 0.5 %Pt and 3.22, 6.25 or 9.09 % of metallic silver. A maximal chloride adsorption capacity of 16.31 mgCl/g was recorded. Full (100 %) separation of Cl- ions from NaCl solutions with [Cl-]0 = 200 mg/L and [H2SO4]0 = 0.5 M was demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据