4.7 Article

Boosting photocatalytic H2 evolution by ingenious construction of isotype heptazine/triazine based porous carbon nitride heterojunction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121490

关键词

Heterojunction; Triazine; Heptazine; Carbon nitride; H-2 evolution

资金

  1. National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China [21706131, 21878159, 22078159, U19B2001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study prepared a high surface area isotype heptazine/triazine based carbon nitride heterojunction (HTCN-1M) using a molten salt method, which utilized H2SO4-treated melamine as precursor. The synergistic effect of the structure's built-in electric field and the abundant specific surface area led to excellent photocatalytic performance with H(2) evolution up to 5764 mu mol h(-1) g(-1), significantly higher than pure g-C3N4.
Design and construction of isotype g-C3N4 heterojunction with lower interfacial resistance was a feasible and promising option to achieve the efficient separation of photo-induced electron-holes pairs. However, isotype gC(3)N(4) heterojunction prepared by direct thermal polymerization usually possessed low specific surface area, which limited the further elevation of photocatalytic performance. In this work, isotype heptazine/triazine based carbon nitride heterojunction (HTCN-1M) with high surface area was prepared by molten salt method which employed heated H2SO4-pretreated melamine as the precursor. The abundant specific surface area (180 m(2) g(-1)) was ascribed to the pore-making effect of H2SO4 and the templating of molten salt while the efficient transfer and separation of photo-generated charge carriers were attributed to the built-in electric field of the heterojunction structure, whose synergistic effect resulted in the excellent photocatalytic performance of H(2 )evolution, reaching up to 5764 mu mol h(-1) g(-1), which was 19.4 times that of pure g-C3N4. This work provided a new avenue for the design of efficient photocatalysts for the conversion of solar energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据